04 March 2018

Ok, from the start, this is absolutely silly but I had to make mock ups. It’s therapautic, once done it can leave my mind.

JustEat and Grindr share a lot of common data: display data points related to your position, each point got a variable interest, in-between exchange is mandatory to continue, some points can be promoted.. Why not mix the two?

Anyway, this can also work with Tinder. Ignore the pizza once, get unmatched forever.

Grindr splash screen using the Just Eat logo Grindr feel showing profile of delicious food instead of men Profile views showing specs about food. Like calories, category and price Inbox with promoted articles Chat with food, everything is AI powered Confirm payment method to purchase Credits


21 February 2018

Part of many dev interviews require a session on HackerRank to test candidate capacities on algorithms.

Let’s be honest, this is frustration at many levels. Many of us will stress about it and cannot show the best of themselves. On the other side, youngsters getting out uni are fully prepared for this after many years of theory. But the most important: it’s not a good way to test a candidate.

Nobody will spend most of their time writing any of these algorithms or similar. It might represent 3% of your job, at best.

We need a better test. Something that will test what they gonna really do. Like dealing with out of date legacy code. Debbuging some crappy stuff. Facing technical issues in weird conditions.

Let me introduce SpaghettiRank.

It works exactly like HackerRank except the exercise will show you some out of date code. The goal is to explain what it does, explain the choice of the author, and add new feature without breaking the existing ones.

Putting people in front a piece of code they didn’t write tell you more about your candidate than anything else. Their reaction to something badly designed will let you see if they try to understand author design choice or just shout how stupid the author was. Asking to add a feature reveal their feeling about following the existing logic (even if the conception is not ideal) to keep consistency or prefer to rewrite everything. These situations can also bring you to talk about their previous experiences and discover more about them. Having to work on a piece of code from the framework you use show you their experience with it in a very short time.

Because seriously, you know how to write a binary search tree? Well go debug an old Angular 1.2.14 directive without tests and docs that keeps creating undigestable errors logs that are longer than the bible!! [Undigestable.. Angular.. you get it? Ok, Im out]

In the meantime, you can still show a real pull request to a candidate ask them to analyse it. It should be good enough.



Fusion of hipsters and pixel art

14 January 2018

Triangulart is an old project that came up when I needed to build an illustration based on triangles. After spending too much time on Illustrator to figure out how to make it easy I realised I could build my own editor as a WebApp. It didn’t represent a lot of efforts because most of the code was coming from triangulr to generate the grid, then few UI elements and DOM event to build a basic editor. It was minimalist (even brutalist) but did the job pretty well. It was enough to waste few minutes on it. HackerNews proved it to me by keeping my link at the top for a good Friday afternoon.

After few months (or year?) it was time to improve the tool. Some missing features were crucial when a big project is done with it. The opportunity was perfect to learn VueJS which was used for the UI.

As part of the new features:

The interface and code is not perfect. There are some good code split to do, better routing, better menu layout.. Also, moving to canvas would be a huge performance gain for big workspaces.

I’m looking forward to see what users gonna make with it.

However, I thought back about the reasons I created this app to reach the conclusion that my life follow this pattern:

Try Triangulart

‘‘What? Is it a webapp?’’

19 September 2017

Here are the consequences of a lack of sleep and massive listening of Justice live.

This awkward moment was offered to you by the grace of Pink Flamingos.


29 April 2017

This is love letter for people who make Open Source.

For those having faith to wake up after seeing the tsunami of GitHub email notifications.

For those who keep contributing to core modules used everywhere but nobody see.

For those who still find time to provide examples and explanations to newbies that don’t even replay or say thanks.

For those who still got the courage to argue with tact to people who wants to implement stuff that aren’t into the project’s guideline.

For those who keep receiving suggestions of features to implement but never see a single pull request.

For those who keep that passion and enthusiasm day after day, years after years.

For those who sometime bring a solution or fix an issue in less time than any customer service (even if it’s not their role).

For those who keep contributing to projects they didn’t created.

For those who want to just want to bring a piece of code does things differently without pretending being the best solution.

For those who maintain a repo and deal with medium articles bashing their work. Usually written by people who never contribute.

Btw, to all the twats who keep making posts to know which framework is the best: go f!%# yourself, kindly. This the dev version of who got the biggest. Just be constructive and try to find out for what kind of project/context which framework is most adapted to. There’s no need for more shitposting on the internet.

For those who dedicate their life for it and got the courage to say “Stop! It’s weekend time, and it’s my weekend! And it’s gonna be fabulous bitches! See ya on monday open source world!” (and because you damn fuck deserve it!)

You all rocks and we should do our best to make sure you keep the same pleasure to work on it.